Organizing Arguments
Question: What am I trying to prove?
Answer: The American child is being corrupted by exposure to certain types of music.
Question: Why are American children being corrupted by exposure to certain types of music?
Answer: American children are being corrupted by exposure to certain types of music because…
Everything that follows “because” is a point to cover about the claim.
1. … because too many kids do not have parental guidance.
2. … because kids are targeted by artists who deliver an “insidious message” through their music.
3. … because at-risk kids are buying many of those albums and, as a result, they are being exposed to an “insidious” message.
BLOCK METHOD ALTERNATING
METHOD
Thesis: (Claim)
PARAGRAPH 1 Introduction and background
PARAGRAPH 2 PARAGRAPH 2
Opposing Viewpoints A. Opposing Point 1
1, 2 and 3 B. Answer 1
PARAGRAPH 3 PARAGRAPH 3
Answer to point 1 A. Opposing point 2
B. Answer 2
PARAGRAPH 4
Answer to point 2 PARAGRAPH 4
A. Opposing point
PARAGRAPH 5 B. Answer 3
Answer to point 3
POSSIBLE PARAGRAPH 5 (Extra Point)
POSSIBLE PARAGRAPH 6 (Extra Point)
PARGRAPH (CONCLUSION)
At some point in the essay, you should make a concession (a point at which you can agree on at least one point).
EXAMPLE:
Claim: The degree of parental involvement is not to blame for youth violence. (I know this to be true because)
Reason 1: We have many examples of parents who are actively involved with their children’s lives, yet those children exhibit violent behavior.
Reason 2: We have many examples of children who never exhibit violent behavior in spite of the fact that they have no parental involvement in their lives.
Reason 3: There are cases in which two or more siblings raised in the same home b the same parents with the same amount of parental involvement exhibit different kinds of behaviors--one sibling may be violent while the other is not.
Reason 4: Many other factors influence the behavior of children once they reach a certain age.
LABELING YOUR
ARGUMENT
If differing points of go unlabeled, readers may become bewildered. To prevent confusion, identify each view every time there is a shift from one side to another. The four pairs of transitions below will be helpful.
Con: adversaries; opponents; critics; opposition
Pro: advocates; proponents; supporters; sponsors
The list below
indicates some of the common transition words indicating logical connections
between sentences and paragraphs. The words are grouped according to the
logical function they carry out (this list is not meant to be comprehensive).
1. Words indicating a continuity with what has gone before: and, in
addition, moreover, furthermore, also, indeed, besides,
secondly, next, similarly, again, equally
important, beyond that.
2. Words indicating an example or
illustration of a point introducing evidence: for example, for
instance, as an illustration.
3. Words adding emphasis to a point
which is reinforcing a previous point: in fact, in other words, that
is, indeed, as a matter of fact.
4. Words indicating a conclusion
from or a result of what you have just been discussing: thus, hence,
therefore, consequently, as a result.
5. Words indicating a contrast with
what has just been said: but, however, nevertheless,
by contrast, on the other hand, conversely.
6. Words indicating a qualification,
doubt, or reservation about what you have just been discussing: no doubt,
of course, to be sure.
7. Words indicating a summary
statement is coming up: in short, all in all,
in brief, in conclusion, to conclude, given all this.
8. Pronoun and adjectival links to
something which has gone before: this, that, the
above-mentioned, such.
9. Words establishing time
relationships (important in narrative paragraphs): after, afterwards,
then, later, before, while, at the same time,
immediately, thereupon, next, meanwhile, subsequently,
previously, simultaneously.
10. Words indicating spatial
relationships (important in physical descriptions): above, beside,
next to, on the other side, facing, parallel,
across from, adjacent.